Campaign 2010

Jun 22, 2004

Read Carefully

So apparently the Saddam / Osama “controversy” continues, and Kevin Drum weighs in to tell us why the administration will not completely lose the argument, despite the many weaknesses he later lays out:

It’s true that the 9/11 commission didn’t say there was no relationship between Saddam and al-Qaeda. They merely said there was no collaboration on attacks against the United States.

Wrong.

It is hard to sort through this stuff, in fact it is hard to find a quote that is anywhere near complete.  But forget the section stating there was no involvement in 9/11, and just look at this:

 

“There have been reports that contacts between Iraq and al Qaeda also occurred after bin Laden had returned to Afghanistan, but they do not appear to have resulted in a collaborative relationship. Two senior bin Laden associates have adamantly denied that any ties existed between al Qaeda and Iraq.”

No collaborative relationship, period.  And yet:

 

“We have removed an ally of al-Qaeda.”

- President Bush

And yet:

“9/11 changed everything” is the context by which everything follows. No speech about homeland security or Iraq should begin without a reference to 9/11.

- Frank Luntz talking points

Anybody listening to the House hearings with Wolfowitz today might have noticed that Luntz’s message got through loud and clear.


Want the latest updates? Follow the DCCC on Facebook and Twitter: